| VRSTA GRADIVA | analitična raven (sestavni del), tekstovno gradivo, tiskano, 1.01 - izvirni znanstveni članek |
| DRŽAVA IZIDA | Slovenija |
| LETO IZIDA | 2012 |
| JEZIK BESEDILA/IZVIRNIKA | slovenski |
| PISAVA | latinica |
| AVTOR | Milosavljevič, Marko - avtor |
| NASLOV | Regulacija in percepcija sovražnega govora : analiza dokumentov in odnosa urednikov spletnih portalov |
| V PUBLIKACIJI | Teorija in praksa. - ISSN 0040-3598. - ǂLetn. ǂ49, ǂšt. ǂ1 (jan.-feb. 2012), str. 112-130, 232. |
| KRATKA VSEBINA | Članek predstavlja problem ustreznega poznavanja regulacijskega in samoregulacijskega okvira sovražnega govora v slovenskih medijih, in sicer na primeru urednikov spletnih medijev kot odbirateljev. Uporabljeni sta dve metodi, in sicer analiza ključnih dokumentov in poglobljeni polstrukturirani intervjuji z izbranimi uredniki slovenskih množičnih medijev. Ugotovitve analize kažejo, da določeni uredniki ne ločujejo med sovražnim govorom in razžalitvami ali kletvicami, kar kaže na slabo poznavanje pravnega okvira, pa tudi samega pojma sovražnigovor. Analiza tudi kaže, da to lahko vodi v specifične odločitve urednikovin da so s tem odločitve o sovražnem govoru pogosto prepuščene individualnipercepciji urednika // The article analyses the way hate speech is interpreted by editors as key gatekeepers and definers of the editorial policy of certain media. Related to this is the question of how hate speechis defined in regulatory and self-regulatory terms and documents. The analysis is based on two methods: first an analysis of key documents that form the framework of Slovenian media and, second, in-depth interviews witheditors of selected Slovenian (online) media. We found that certain editorsdo not differentiate between hate speech and defamatory speech and other forms of controversial or banned speech. These perceptions reveal a lack ofknowledge regarding the legal framework of hate speech. The analysis also shows that editors of Slovenian online media donot have a precise regulatory and self-regulatory system and thus many decisions regarding hate speech are arbitrary |
| OPOMBE | Bibliografija: str. 128-130 // Povzetek ; Abstract |
| OSTALI NASLOVI | ǂThe ǂregulation and perception of hate speech: analysis of documents and perceptions held by the editors of Slovenian online media |
| PREDMETNE OZNAKE | Novinarstvo // Journalism // Sovražni govor //Hate speech // Regulacija // Regulation // Spletni portali // Web portals // Analiza vsebine // Content analysis (Communication) // Slovenija // Slovenia |
| PREDMETNE OZNAKE | // množični mediji |
| UDK | 316.647:004.738.5 |