| KRATKA VSEBINA | Članek preučuje družbeno določenost normativnih predpostavk novinarstva skozi optiko novinarjev, politikov in državljanov, pri čemer se osredinja na sodobne politične, ekonomske in kulturne dinamike slovenskega novinarskega in medijskega okolja. Glede na storitve, ki jih novinarji nudijo svojim odjemalcem, in hkrati glede na različne primarne funkcije novinarjev v družbi s pregledom literature prepoznavamo pet normativnih vrst novinarstva: mediativno, odvetniško, razsvetljensko, razvedrilno in komunitaristično. Razpravo o tipih novinarstva uokvirjamo s ponovnim premišljevanjem občutnih transformacij v odnosu med državo, civilno družbo in mediji, ki so v Sloveniji nastopile z vpeljavo različice zahodnega tipa demokracije in tržne ekonomije pred dvemadesetletjema ter s sočasnimi normativnimi spremembami novinarstva, odnosov med novinarji, politiki in državljani ter njihovimi funkcijami v političnemživljenju in novinarstvu. Glavni raziskovalni cilji članka so identificirati, kako anketirani slovenski novinarji, politiki in državljanipercepirajo funkcije novinarjev v poročanju o politiki, preučiti razlike med temi skupinami anketirancev v politično, ekonomsko in kulturno specifičnem kontekstu ter skozi prizmo normativnih vrst novinarstva ponuditi premislek o sodobnem statusu novinarstva in novinarjev v politiki.// The article examines social specificity of normative assumptions of journalism through the lenses of journalists, politicians and citizens withan emphasis on contemporary political, economic and cultural dynamics in Slovenian journalism and media environment. Literature review reveals five normative types of journalism, in terms of the kind of service journalists provide to the clients and primary functions of journalists in the society:meditative, advocacy, enlightenment, entertainment and communitarian journalism. The text frames the debate on types of journalism by (re)considering profound changes in the relationship between state, civil society and media in Slovenia after adoption of Western-type democracy and market economy two decades ago, which have transformed normative grounding of journalism, relationship between journalists, politicians and citizens and their functions in political life and journalism. The main research objectives of the article are to identify perceptions of surveyed Slovenianjournalists, politicians and citizens on journalistsć functions in reporting on politics, examine the differences between these groups of respondents in politically, economically and culturally specific context ofmedia and journalism, and reflect on contemporary status of journalism and journalists in politics through the prism of normative types of journalism. |