| KRATKA VSEBINA | Namen, zasnova: Namen prispevka je v obstoječih bibliografskih zapisih identificirati bibliografske odnose ter ugotoviti, ali podatki v zapisih zadostujejo, da uporabnik najde sorodna dela, izrazne oblike in pojavne oblike in ali ti podatki omogočajo njihovo avtomatsko povezovanje. Upoštevali smo odnose, ki so opisani v študiji Funkcionalne zahteve za bibliografske zapise (angl. Functional requirementsfor bibliographic records - FRBR), osredotočili pa smo se na odnose med deli in med izraznimi oblikami. Opozorili smo tudi na nedoslednosti pri navajanju bibliografskih podatkov, ki otežujejo frbrizacijo1 kataloga, uporabniku pa iskanje sorodnih del. Metodologija/pristop: Za posamezne vrste odnosov smo poiskali primere, ki ponazarjajo trenutno naravo zapisovanja bibliografskih podatkov in posledice takega zapisovanja (v podatkovnih zbirkah COBIB in NUK ter v segmentu katalogizacije programa COBISS3). Za prikaz nekaterih odnosov smo uporabili znana dela in potem poskusili najti sorodna dela, pri nekaterih odnosih pa smo uporabili primere, na katere smo naleteli ob vsakdanjem delu. Analiza/rezultati: Analiza je pokazala, da podatki v bibliografskih zapisih uporabnikom v nekaterih primerih sicer omogočajo identifikacijo odnosov s sorodnimi deli,vendar le deloma omogočajo avtomatsko povezovanje zapisov za sorodna dela. Ob doslednejšem navajanju podatkov in upoštevanju katalogizacijskih pravil bi bili rezultati lahko precej boljši, bo pa treba uvesti sodobnejša katalogizacijska pravila, ki bodo omogočala navajanje podatkov na ustreznejši način oziroma na tak način, da bo omogočeno avtomatsko povezovanje zapisov za sorodna dela. Omejitve raziskave: Omejili smo se na monografske publikacije (podatkovna zbirka COBIB vsebuje bibliografske zapise za različne vrste gradiva) in na odnose med deli in med izraznimi oblikami (model FRBR obravnava precej več odnosov, ki obstajajo med posameznimi entitetami); vseh vrst gradiva in vseh odnosov, predstavljenih v FRBR, v enem prispevku ni mogoče obravnavati. Izvirnost/uporabnost raziskave: Ob pregledu podatkov v izbranih bibliografskih zapisih smo odkrili razloge za težave pri identifikaciji odnosov v zapisih in pri povezovanju zapisov za sorodna dela ter predlagali dopolnitve in spremembe formata COMARC in katalogizacijskih pravil, ki bi omogočale uporabniku, da v podatkovni zbirki COBIB najde sorodna dela. // Purpose/concept: The purpose of the article is to identify bibliographic relationships in present bibliographic records and to determine if the data available in thebibliographic records is sufficient for a user to identify related works, expressions and manifestations, and if the automated connection based on the information contained in those records is possible. The relationships considered were those described in the study Functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR); of these relationships we focused on relationships among works and expressions. Furthermore, the article also points out the inconsistency of bibliographic data which makes it difficultto FRBRize a catalogue, while a user has difficulties in retrieving relatedworks. Methodology/approach: Examples for individual types of relationshipswere found; the examples represent the current nature of recording bibliographic data and the consequences of such recording (in COBIB database, the database of the National and University Library of Slovenia, and in the cataloguing segment of COBISS3 programme). To illustrate the relationships we used some well-known works and then tried to find related works, while some relationships were illustrated through examples we encountered in our everyday work. Analysis/results: The analysis showed that in some cases the data in bibliographic records allows users to identify relationships with related works, while the automated connection of related works is only partially possible. More consistent bibliographic data and more uniform consideration of cataloguing rules could give much better results, however, new and updated cataloguing rules should be introduced that would allow more appropriate use of bibliographic data in order to enable automated connection for related works. Research limits: The research was limited to monographic publications (COBIB database comprises bibliographic records covering different types of publications) and to relationships among works and expressions (the FRBR model covers many more relationships that exist among individual entities); it is not possible to show all types of publications and all FRBR relationships in one article. Originality/practical implications: The examination of the selected bibliographic records revealed why it is difficult to identify relationships in the records and connect the records for related works. We proposed some updates and changes of COMARC and of cataloguing rules that would allow a user to find related works in the COBIB database. |