Skip Navigation Linksdomov > napredno iskanje > rezultati > izpis
Zapis SUTRS

VRSTA GRADIVAanalitična raven (sestavni del), tekstovno gradivo, tiskano, 1.01 - izvirni znanstveni članek
DRŽAVA IZIDASlovenija
LETO IZIDA2007
JEZIK BESEDILA/IZVIRNIKAangleški
PISAVAlatinica
AVTORKoman, Matjaž - avtor
ODGOVORNOSTHadži Vasileva-Markovska, Verica - avtor
NASLOVTransition firms in Illyria : do workers stillmanage? : evidence from Macedonian firms
V PUBLIKACIJIEconomic and business review. - ISSN 1580-0466. - ǂVol. ǂ9, ǂno. ǂ1 (feb. 2007), str. 23-45.
KRATKA VSEBINAV skladu z Ward-Domar-Vanekovim teoretični modelom podjetja, ki je imel korenine v decentraliziranem socialističnem sistemu bivše Jugoslavije, je bil cilj podjetja maksimizacija dohodka na zaposlenega in ne dobiček. Tega analiza (Prašnikar in drugi, 1994) za povprečno podjetje iz bivše Jugoslavije ni potrdila. Je pa analiza potrdila, da je bilo obnašanje podjetij iz manj razvitih republik bivše Jugoslavije (Makedonija je bila ena izmed manj razvitih republik) v skladu z maksimizacijo dohodka na zaposlenega. V tem članku smo spremenili Prašnikarjev model pogajanj. Ta model smo potem testirali na podatkih makedonskih podjetij za obdobje 1994-1999. Ugotovili smo, da se makedonska podjetja obnašajo v skladu z makimizacijo dohodka na zaposlenega. Rezultatiso prav tako pokazali, da ni razlik v obnašanju podjetij, katerih večinski lastniki so delavci oz. managerji (notranje lastništvo) in podjetij, katerih večinski lastniki niso delavci (zunanje lastništvo) in to kljub dejstvu, da so podjetja z večinskim notranjim lastništvom izbrala defenzivno obliko prestrukturiranja. // According to the Ward-Domar-Vanek theoretical model of a labor-managed firm, which had roots in former Yugoslav decentralized socialist system, firm's goalwas to maximize income per worker rather than profit. Although for an average firm from former Yugoslavia this was not supported by the data, a behavior of firms that come from less-developed regions (Macedonia was on of the less developed regions in former Yugoslavia) was consistent with the income per worker maximiyation hypothesis. In this paper we modify the Prasnikar et al. (1994) bargaining model and test it on the 1994-1999 panel data of Macedonian firms. We find that their behavior is still consistent with income-per-worker-maximization hypothesis. The results also show, that there are no distinctions between behavior of firms that after privatization were majority owned by insiders (workers and managers) and firms that majority owners were outsiders, despite the evidence that internally owned firms (majority owners were insiders) have chosen defensive restructuring, while externally owned (majority owners were outsiders) firms have chosen strategic restructuring.
OPOMBEBibliografija: str. 44-45
OSTALI NASLOVIParticipativno podjetje v tranziciji: ali delavci še vladajo? Analiza obnašanja makedonskih podjetij
PREDMETNE OZNAKE// Makedonija // tranzicija // družbena lastnina // privatizacija // podjetja // vodenje // management // delavsko soupravljanje
UDK005.5:338.246(497.7)

izvedba, lastnina in pravice: NUK 2010