| KRATKA VSEBINA | Prispevek kaže boj za nadzor nad internetom naprimeru distribucije IP-naslovov in domenskih imen. Določena mera samoupravljanja internetne infrastrukture je namreč z "webifikacijo" privedla do režima internetnega samoupravljanja, pozneje do režima javno-zasebnega partnerstva, nato pa se je upravljanje razvilo v koncept večpartnerstva, ki ga uteleša Forum za internetno upravljanje (IGF). IGF pane predstavlja le novega pristopa pri urejanju interneta, temveč kar novo paradigmo upravljanja globalnih zadev, ki transcendirajo državne meje in oblike medvladnega sodelovanja, ki kulminirajo v OZN. A paradigma večpartnerstva lahko ob ohranjeni centralizaciji dejanskega nadzora nad internetno infrastrukturo postane zgolj maska, ki služi perpetuaciji nasilja, ki ga "prvi" svet izvaja nad preostalim svetom tudi v novem (kiber) prostoru. Boj za nadzor na internetu pa prispevek ponazori z analizo obvezne hrambe prometnih podatkov in strategij ter točk internetnega filtriranja. Obe praksi namreč uresničujeta scenarij "sekuratizacije" na internetu, po katerem rešitve ne odpravljajo problemov,temveč uničujejo to, kar naj bi rešile, in povečujejo nadzor. // The paper presents the struggle for control over the internet on the example of the distribution of IP addresses and domain names. A certain extent of self-governance of the internet infrastructure, with "webification", led atfirst to a regime of public-private partnership, and finally, governance has evolved to the concept of multi-stakeholderism, embodied by the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). IGF not only represents a new approach to the regulation of the internet, but rather a new paradigm of governance of global matters which transcend state as well as forms of intergovernmental cooperation, culminating in the UN and its agencies. By preserving the centralisation of control over the internet infrastructure, a paradigm of multi-stakeholderism can become just a mask, serving the perpetuation of the violence that the "first" world uses against the rest of the world alsoin the new (cyber)space. The struggle for control on the internet is illustrated in this paper by an analysis of the mandatory retention of traffic data and strategies of internet filtering. Both of the aforementioned practices realize a scenario of internet security by which solutions do not solve problems, but rather create them, destroy that whichthey are supposed to save, and increase control. |