| KRATKA VSEBINA | Prispevek izhaja iz dejstva, da so tudi informacijski sistemi, prek katerih poteka elektronsko poslovanje sodišč innotariata, ranljivi. Kljub visoki stopnji zagotovljene informacijske varnosti zaradi naglega razvoja tehnike na tem področju namreč noben informacijski sistem ne velja za nedotakljivega. Zlorabe pri elektronskem poslovanju sodišč in notariata se zaenkrat v (zelo skromni) teoriji s tega področja ne obravnavajo ločeno, kot posebna zaokroženatematika, ampak v sklopu tistega dela kriminalitete, povezane z računalniki, ki se tiče neupravičenih vstopov oziroma vdorov v informacijske sisteme. Analiza slovenske kazenske zakonodaje s tega področja kaže, da kljub dejstvu, da jeta zakonodaja usklajena z mednarodnimi standardi in zahtevami EU, zaradi notranje neusklajenosti oziroma premajhne dodelanosti inkriminacij ne omogoča kvalitetne pravne kvalifikacije dejanj, povevzanih z vdori v informacijske sisteme za poslovanje sodišč in notariata. // The article results from the fact that also information systems, through whichelectronic performances of the court and notary's office are carried out, are vulnerable. Despite the high level o guaranteed information security due to the fast development of techinque in this field, no information system is considered inviolable. Abuses in electronic performances of the courts and notary's office are for the moment in (a very modest) theory in this area not dealt with separately, as a special subject, but together with that part of criminality, connected with computers, which concern unauthorized entry and/orbreaking in the information systems. The analysis of Slovenian criminal legislation in thisfield shows, despite the fact that this legislation has been sunchronized with international standards and demands of EU that it does not enable goodquality legal qualification of acts, connected with breaking into the information systems for performances of the courts and notary's office, because they are not synchronized and&or not finalized internally. |