| KRATKA VSEBINA | Uvod: Pojavnost revije v elektronskih medijih prispeva k večji prepoznavnosti in vidnosti stroke. Uredništvo Obzornika zdravstvene nege je v letu 2008 pričelo s projektom digitalizacije časopisav obsegu celotnih besedil. Zanimalo nas je, ali je projekt digitalizacije vplival na izposojo revije v knjižnicah. Metode: Podatke o izposoji smo zbrali iz lokalnih baz podatkov knjižnic, vključenih v sistem COBISS.SI, kiso v letu 2008 imele naročen vsaj en izvod Obzornika zdravstvene nege. V ožji izbor smo vključili prvi dve po številu izposoj na dom in v čitalnico:Knjižnico Zdravstvene fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani ter Knjižnico Fakultete za zdravstvene vede Univerze v Mariboru. Statistična enota je bilo leto izposoje. Za obdelavo podatkov smo uporabili statistični program SPSS 20.0. Rezultati: V obdobju od 2004 do 2010 smo zabeležili največ izposoj Obzornika zdravstvene nege v knjižnicah: Zdravstvene fakultete (3765), Fakultete za zdravstvene vede (3147), Visoke šole za zdravstveno nego Jesenice (331), Univerzitetne knjižnice Maribor (217)in Centralne medicinske knjižnice (133). V opazovanem obdobju smo v prvihdveh po številuizposoj, ki sta skupaj prispevali kar 91 % izposoj, ugotovili upad izposojeObzornika zdravstvene nege (6,5 % povprečni letni upad) in Zdravstvenega obzornika (15,2 % povprečni letni upad). V teh dveh knjižnicah smo zabeležili tudi porast izposoje, in sicer v letu 2007: 46,9 % za Obzornik zdravstvene nege in 11,8 % za Zdravstveni obzornik. V ostalih knjižnicah upada izposoje ni zaznati. Diskusija in zaključek: Ugotovili smo trend upadanja izposoje Obzornika zdravstvene nege in Zdravstvenega obzornika,karje lahko odsev in odraz digitalne dobe. Zavoljo večje branosti, prepoznavnosti in podpore praksi zdravstvene in babiške nege je čas, da Obzornik zdravstvene nege postane prostodostopna e-revija. // Introduction:The availability of the digitalised version of the journal will add to better recognition and visibility of the profession. The editorship of the Slovenian Nursing Review embarked on the project of digitalisation of the texts in their entirety. An enquiry was performed as to the changed extent andrate of library borrowing of the journal due to the project. Methods: The data on library borrowing were collected from the local database of thelibraries included in the COBISS.SI system which were subscribed to at least one print copy of the journal. Included in the study were the libraries of the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ljubljana and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor which present with the greatest number of items borrowed for the use at home and the library reading room. The statistical unit was the year of borrowing. The SPSS 20.0 statistical programme was used for statistical analysis of the sampled data. Results: Within the period from 2004 to 2010 thefollowing libraries lended the greatest number of the journal copies: Faculty of Health Sciences, Ljubljana (3765), Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor (3147), College of Nursing Jesenice (331), University Library Maribor (217), Central Medical Library, University of Ljubljana (133). It was established that 91% of the borrowingfall into the first two years of the period studied, followed by the annualmedian drop in borrowing the Slovenian Nursing Review by 6,5 % and the Journal of the Slovenian Nursing Associationby 15,2 %. Both libraries noteda respective increase in 2007, namely, the Slovenian Nursing Review by 46.9% and the Journal of the SlovenianNursing Association by 11.8%. Other libraries documented no change in the lending/borrowing rate of the journal. Discussion and conclusion: Results of the study show a decline in the borrowing rates of the Slovenian Nursing Review and the Journal of the Slovenian Nursing Association, to all probabilty as a result of digitalisation of written sources. The state of affairs necessitates a freeaccess to electronic version of the journal in order to gain greater popularity and support of the Slovenian nursing and midwifery care. |